Wednesday, October 21, 2020

A Word for Wednesday

 "It remains certainly true that all natural loves can be inordinate.
Inordinate does not mean 'insufficiently cautious.' Nor does it mean 'too big.'
It is not a quantitative term.
It is probably impossible to love any human being simply 'too much.'
We may love him too much in proportion to our love for God;
but it is the smallness of our love for God, 
not the greatness of our love for the man,
that constitutes the inordinacy."

~from The Four Loves by C.S. Lewis~

Wednesday, October 14, 2020

A Word for Wednesday

 "Christ did not teach and suffer that we might become, 
even in the natural loves, 
more careful of our own happiness. 
If a man is not uncalculating towards the earthly beloveds whom he has seen, 
he is none the more likely to be so towards God whom he has not. 
We shall draw nearer to God, 
not by trying to avoid the sufferings inherent in all loves, 
but by accepting them and offering them to Him; throwing away all defensive armour. 
If our hearts need to be broken, 
and if He chooses this as the way in which they should break, 
so be it."

~from The Four Loves by C.S. Lewis~
Michelangelo's Pietá

Wednesday, October 7, 2020

A Word for Wednesday

 "I have no duty to be anyone's Friend and no man in the world has a duty to be mine. 
No claims, no shadow of necessity. 
Friendship is unnecessary, 
like philosophy, like art, like the universe itself (for God did not need to create). 
It has no survival value; rather it is one of those things which give value to survival."

~from The Four Loves by C.S. Lewis~

Monday, October 5, 2020

Let's Bust a Recap : Pippi Longstocking

The last time I read Pippi Longstocking, I was probably only 10 or 11 years old. (Which means it's been well over 20 years since I read it, but let's not get into that right now.) I decided to read it out loud this summer to the little boy I nanny because everyone needs a little Pippi in their lives. Especially during 2020.

Pippilotta Delicatessa Windowshade Mackrelmint Efraim's Daughter Longstocking is the daughter of an angel mother she can't remember and a cannibal king father she's very proud of. In Pippi Longstocking, she moves into Villa Villekulla with her pet monkey Mr. Nilsson, her horse (which she's strong enough to lift over her head, by the way) and her suitcase full of gold coins. She befriends the two neighbor kids, Tommy and Annika, and throughout this outrageously funny novel we read about all her wacky adventures with them.

I love this book. It's so funny and Pippi is somehow so lovable despite some of her more questionable behavior. Astrid Lindgren made up these stories for her daughter Karin in 1941 during a time when Karin was home sick from school, and Pippi quickly became a beloved family character. A few years later while Lindgren was bedridden with an injury, she wrote out the stories in an attempt to have them published. They were chosen by Rabén & Sjögren for publication in Sweden in 1945 and since that time, Pippi Longstocking has been translated into 76 languages and Astrid Lindgren is the fourth most translated children's writer trailing only Enid Blyton, Hans Christian Andersen, and the Brothers Grimm. Actually she's the world's eighteenth most translated author ever. 

Pippi Longstocking (the first of three full-length novels about the title character) was translated into English by Florence Lamborn in 1950 when it was published in the U.S. for the first time. The American illustrations were done by Louis S. Glanzman, and I'm curious if they are at all similar to the original illustrations done by Ingrid Vang Nyman because they certainly enhance the reading experience. 

Although Astrid Lindgren wrote more than 30 books for children and all of them have been widely translated, Pippi Longstocking is probably her most well known and beloved literary character and the novel Pippi Longstocking was listed by the Norwegian Nobel Institute as one of the Top 100 Works of World Literature in 2002. 

I never realized how globally celebrated Pippi Longstocking is or how famous Astrid Lindgren was, I just remember loving this book as a kid, and in rereading it this summer, it still holds up. My little guy laughed out loud at Pippi's shenanigans, and I couldn't help giggling along. My favorite story was about Pippi entertaining the two burglars who come to try and rob her of her gold coins. She ends up making them dance for hours, feeds them, and sends them on their way with a gold coin apiece for visiting her. I mean, really now. What a riot.

You should definitely read Pippi Longstocking, and if you have any little people in your life, this one's a fun read-aloud. I've never read the two follow-up novels (Pippi Goes on Board and Pippi in the South Seas), but this first one is entertaining as all get out and I enthusiastically recommend it.

Have you read any stories about Pippi? What was one of your favorite childhood books?

Friday, October 2, 2020

Let's Bust a Recap : Their Eyes Were Watching God

I feel like I have a lot of things to say about this book, and where do I even start? 

A brief history on how I acquired this book and why I even wanted to read it in the first place? 

You know me so well. 

Honestly, I couldn't tell you the first time I ever heard of Their Eyes Were Watching God. The title has always been a familiar one to me, and much like Rebecca by Daphne du Maurier, it kept popping up on those Must-Read-Before-Death lists I'm so fond of looking over. Incidentally, I bought this book and Rebecca on the same trip to The Book Shelter back in the summer of 2018. And as is often the case, it went straight to a cozy spot on my bookshelf and sat there for almost two years before I got around to reading it. 

Their Eyes Were Watching God was not on my 2020 book list but during the dumpster fire that was Aprilthe month where I read six books that were not on my book list and zero that were—Their Eyes Were Watching God somehow sneaked its way into my hands and quickly joined the pile of books in my reading corner that would be "coming to the blog soon" in May. Well, if five months later somehow qualifies as "soon," I guess we're doing all right. 

To start, I'm going to borrow the overview from the National Endowment of the Arts website:
To call Zora Neale Hurston's Their Eyes Were Watching God an "African American feminist classic" may be an accurate statement—it is certainly a frequent statement—but it is a misleadingly narrow and rather dull way to introduce a vibrant and achingly human novel. The syncopated beauty of Hurston's prose, her remarkable gift for comedy, the sheer visceral terror of the book's climax, all transcend any label that critics have tried to put on this remarkable work. First published amid controversy in 1937, then rescued from obscurity four decades later, the novel narrates Janie Crawford's ripening from a vibrant, but voiceless, teenage girl into a woman with her finger on the trigger of her own destiny. Although Hurston wrote the novel in only seven weeks, Their Eyes Were Watching God breathes and bleeds a whole life's worth of urgent experience.
Let me emphasize a few things here. Their Eyes Were Watching God was originally published in 1937. Zora Neale Hurston passed away a little over 22 years later, alone and in complete obscurity, her body being laid to rest in an unmarked grave. Since the resurgence of her work in the 1970s, she is now considered the most successful and most significant black woman writer of the first half of the twentieth century. Over a 30+ year career, she published four novels, two books of folklore, an autobiography, numerous short stories, and several essays, articles, and plays. She was a novelist, folklorist, and anthropologist whose fictional and factual accounts of black heritage remain unparalleled. This woman won multiple Guggenheim Fellowships to gather material for books on authentic Negro folk-life in Haiti and Jamaica. The more I read about her life, the more impressed I am with her. I mean, she wrote Their Eyes Were Watching God—objectively her best work and widely considered one of the best English language novels—in seven weeks!

So how did she end up in such poverty and obscurity? Henry Louis Gates, Jr. attempts to explain:
How could [Zora Neale Hurston] virtually "disappear" from her readership for three full decades? There are no easy answers to this quandary, despite the concerted attempts of scholars to resolve it. It is clear, however, that the loving, diverse, and enthusiastic responses that Hurston's work engenders today were not shared by several of her influential black male contemporaries. The reasons for this are complex and stem largely from what we might think of as their "racial ideologies." Part of Hurston's received heritage—and perhaps the paramount received notion that links the novel of manners in the Harlem Renaissance, the social realism of the thirties, and the cultural nationalism of the Black Arts movement—was the idea that racism had reduced black people to mere ciphers, to beings who only react to an omnipresent racial oppression, whose culture is "deprived" where different, and whose psyches are in the main "pathological." Albert Murray, the writer and social critic, calls this "the Social Science Fiction Monster." Socialists, separatists, and civil rights advocates alike have been devoured by this beast. Hurston thought this idea degrading, its propagation a trap, and railed against it. It was, she said, upheld by "the sobbing school of Negrohood who hold that nature somehow has given them a dirty deal." Unlike Hughes and Wright, Hurston chose deliberately to ignore this "false picture that distorted." Freedom, she wrote in Moses, Man of the Mountain, "was something internal...The man himself must make his own emancipation." And she declared her first novel a manifesto against the "arrogance" of whites assuming that "black lives are only defensive reactions to white actions." Her strategy was not calculated to please.
 He goes on to say that Hurston set out to write a black novel, not a treatise on sociology.

And she was successful. I was immediately swept into the romantic narrative of Their Eyes Were Watching God. Hurston's prose is absolutely beautiful and the way she seamlessly weaves the King's English with the phonetic dialect of Eatonville Ebonics was stunning. I believed every word of Janie Crawford's story.

I felt a particular connection with this novel as it is set in my home of Central Florida. I could easily picture the places Janie lived, and I know from firsthand experience what it is to live through some rip-roaring hurricanes. Hurston writes Florida with crystal clear accuracy as she herself lived most of her life in the setting for Their Eyes Were Watching God, her earliest memories in Eatonville itself. She draws from her personal experiences and relationships with seeming ease to great effect throughout this standout novel. Why this wasn't required reading in my high school instead of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn I'll never know. (And that's with absolutely no disrespect to Huck Finn; it's an excellent novel in its own right.)

If you've stuck with me this far (I hope you have) and if it isn't glaringly obvious by now (I hope it is), this is a novel I'd recommend. The story is just so real and tragic and human and good, and the writing is magnificent. While this book did take me a little bit longer to read because of the phonetic dialect used throughout, I could hear the characters in my head, and I felt like I was right there. Definitely would recommend, especially to my fellow Floridians for the historical context. This is a book I hope you'll love.

Have you ever read a good book that was made even better because you were intimately familiar with the setting? Have you ever found yourself doing a deep dive into an author's life after reading their work? 

Wednesday, September 30, 2020

A Word for Wednesday

"Her finely-touched spirit had still its fine issues, though they were not widely visible. 
Her full nature, like that river of which Cyrus broke the strength, 
spent itself in channels which had no great name on the earth. 
But the effect of her being on those around her was incalculably diffusive: 
for the growing good of the world is partly dependent on unhistoric acts; 
and that things are not so ill with you and me as they might have been, is half owing to the number who lived a faithfully hidden life, and rest in unvisited tombs."

~from Middlemarch by George Eliot~

Monday, September 28, 2020

Let's Bust a Recap : A Tree Grows in Brooklyn

Okay, we're going to start off this final week of September/first week of October (what?!) with the book that's been hanging out in the To Be Blogged About pile the longest. Last year, I completely lost my blogging rhythm (I attribute this solely to the fact that I joined the world of Instagram), and when the time rolled around to document what I read in 2019, I realized there were seven books that I had intended to write recaps for that remained recap-less. Now, I don't write recaps for every single book I read. I don't usually put in the time for re-reads, and some books I just don't care about recapping. But these seven were still out, waiting for their spot on the blog, and I just hadn't gotten to them. I decided to re-evaluate, took your comments into consideration, and determined that I really did want to write recaps for three of the seven: King Lear, The Count of Monte Cristo, and A Tree Grows in Brooklyn. And now, over nine months after finishing it, I'm finally getting around to recapping A Tree Grows in Brooklyn and officially catching up on backlogged posts for 2019. You know. In this completely self-imposed, non-paying chore hobby of blogging. (Feel free to roll your eyes at me all you want; there's a lot of it going on in this house already.)

Alright, alright, enough rambling already. Let's get down to the actual recap, right? 
A Tree Grows in Brooklyn published in 1943 is the first (and most acclaimed) novel of Betty Smith. It is considered one of the greatest American novels of the 20th century and was particularly popular among WWII soldiers as it was one of the Armed Services Edition books shipped for free to American military service personnel. Smith said she received ten times more fan mail from servicemen than she did from anyone else. 

In it, we meet our leading character Francie Nolan and read about her life from ages 11 through 17 growing up in the tenements in Brooklyn with her fun-loving brother Neeley, alcoholic father Johnny, hardworking mother Katie, and other extended family, particularly Katie's sisters and mother, the other Rommely women. The story of Francie details the personal dreams and desires of our avid book-loving protagonist while living in poverty in the early 1900s but more broadly portrays the hopes of early 20th century immigrants to rise above poverty through their children. Francie is ultimately symbolized by our title tree that tenaciously grows in the midst of the tenements despite almost impossible conditions. 

The novel is largely an autobiographical account of Betty Smith's own childhood growing up as the oldest daughter of poor German-American immigrants, and it is sad. There are so many people who dearly love this novel and laud its hopefulness and the picture of Francie rising out of poverty, but my heart ached for this young girl and her strained relationship with her mother, her grief over the father she idolized as he grappled with alcoholism and eventually succumbed to an early death, her struggle to get an education from teachers who were just too overworked and overwhelmed to really care about the young minds walking into their classrooms each day. While I smiled at many of Francie's and Neeley's antics as young Brooklyn kids, the novel left a bittersweet taste in my mouth. I hated finding out that Francie's first young love was just some boy on a trip to the big city using her, and I wished the whole book through that she and her mother could just connect. I wanted so desperately for the Nolan family to find the true source of Hope instead of fulfilling the requirements of an empty religion.

I see why the book was a success, and I definitely get why it was so popular among young servicemen during the war, many of whom I am sure could intimately relate to the Nolan family and their experiences. I think it's an excellent novel, and I would much rather read a book that makes my heart ache than one that doesn't make me feel anything at all or worse, makes me regret spending the time to read it in the first place (lookin' at you, Kite Runner)

But ultimately, A Tree Grows in Brooklyn left me feeling melancholy and even though it's a book I would actually recommend, I'm not sure if I'll ever revisit it myself. Does that make sense? Have you ever read a book that you thought was really good, but you were just sad that it made you sad? I loved the Nolan family, and I just really, really wanted them to be happy. You know?

If you take anything away from this recap, please take away the fact that almost a year later, A Tree Grows in Brooklyn is still making me feel big feelings. And those are the kind of books that I think are worth reading. Those are the books I set out to read when I came up with this little blog about Reading the Best Books First.